Blog

Hybrid Event: Digital Methods in Brazil

[cross-post]

Call for Participation

This roundtable fosters dialogue about the current state of digital methods for Internet research in Brazil. We seek to celebrate emerging research practices and kick off a Global South network, situating them within a transitional methodological moment in which digital methods and methodologies have been built with, in and about AI, web platforms and data visualisation. This roundtable does not provide an exhaustive overview of digital methods in Brazil. Instead, it focuses on approaches specifically developed within the Brazilian context, offering unique perspectives on the field. đŸ‡§đŸ‡·

✏Confirm your participation here. If you join us online, we will email you the link.

🔗You are welcome to join the Digital Methods Global South Network by collaborating with us to map Digital Methods in Brazil (click here!) The results of this form will be displayed here and updated continuously đŸ€“.

Join us in person or online! âœšđŸ‘©đŸ»â€đŸ’»âŁïž

What Digital Methods are we talking about?

The digital methods we discuss are known as a means to repurpose the functioning of dominant web platforms, search engines and online data for social research. Also, considering the technicity of AI and computational medium, these methods invite researchers to (re) think and create new ways of designing and implementing research methods. Digital Methods have been used to advance social media research, media and OSINT studies, and digital investigation.

Digital methods are crucially situated in the technological environments they utilise and build on: the web environments, data, technologies and practices, and software for data curation, analysis and visualisation. In this sense, designing and implementing digital methods integrates i) the technical aspects of web environments, technologies, objects, and AI but also respects ii) online (sub) cultures of use while iii) actively and critically engaging with capturing, analysis and visualisation software in their own language. These pillars not only inform, (re)shape and add new layers of meaning to the object of study but also form the epistemological foundation of knowledge central to digital methods. 

A hybrid round-table at King’s College London

This hybrid round table will discuss the current status of digital methods research in Brazil and what one can understand as “methods” when advancing research with the web as a methodological landscape. Rather than defining an exhaustive landscape of the practice, it aims to open up discussions about the role of digital methods in humanities and social sciences and their broad societal impact from a Brazilian perspective. What are the emerging creative methods developed in Brazil that leverage the web, its technologies and data to address research questions starting online/offline? Which digital methods are being implemented, and what for? What are their relevance and broader implications for studying digital media and culture in the country? Who is developing digital methods and research software? How are Brazil’s gender and race-diverse perspectives advancing the field? 

In this celebrative encounter, panellists will discuss: a mapping of initiatives and labs across five Brazilian regions within this context, the convergences and possibilities of connecting digital methods with traditional (Digital) Media and Communication Studies schools, and the history of software development for digital methods research in Brazil and its challenges.

A quick-and-dirty Historical Context of Digital Methods in Brazil

⚠ Spoiler Alert: This is a simplified and brief overview rather than a comprehensive introduction to digital methods and their historical context in Brazil. 

In early 2011, three women started the first steps of digital methods in Brazil with the book “MĂ©todos de Pesquisa para Internet” (2011), published by Sulina in Porto Alegre, Brazilian South Region. Suely Fragoso, Raquel Recuero and Adriana Amaral introduce methodological approaches that account for the Internet as an object of research (the subject being studied), a research environment (the setting where research is conducted) and a research instrument (e.g., a tool for data collection on a specific topic). Examples are network visualisation using online data, hyperlinks and ethnographic analysis for internet studies. In 2012, Fernanda Bruno founded the MediaLab.UFRJ at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Brazilian Southeast Region. Based in the School of Communication, the lab focuses on techno-politics, subjectivities, and visibilities, using digital methods for data analysis and visualisation in the humanities. 

In 2013, in the “golden” era of Facebook, Twitter and Instagram APIs, research labs such as Labic in Espirito Santo advanced digital methods for social media research to monitor and study the 2013 protests in Brazil, also known as June Journeys. This series of nationwide demonstrations claimed to stop corruption and improve public services, among other grievances. The lab, constituted by a multidisciplinary team of coordinators, has significantly contributed to the growth of digital methods in Brazil by showing the impact and relevance of repurposing web data and technologies in a societal context. The book “A Comunicação das Coisas: Teoria Ator-Rede e Cibercultura” (2013) by AndrĂ© Lemos became an early influence on the methodological thinking that emphasises the agency of media and their mediations in shaping digital phenomena. Lemos’ research lab LAB404 (founded in 2006) at the Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Brazilian Northeast Region, and work, drawing from Science and Technology Studies (STS), while being characterised by a conceptual framework, his advocacy for addressing the technical affordances of media in communication studies laid foundational groundwork aligned with the principles of digital methods and their development in Brazil.

In 2016, the data journalism Coda.BR event in SĂŁo Paulo emerged to provide training for journalists, researchers, and data enthusiasts in Brazil, and it later became known as the Brazilian Conference on Data Journalism and Digital Methods. Everton Zanella Alvarenga, then-executive director of Open Knowledge Brazil, and journalists NatĂĄlia Mazotte and Marco TĂșlio Pires, were instrumental in implementing the project in Brazil. In the same year, the Brazilian Institute of Research and Data Analysis (IBPAD) and the Getulio Vargas Foundation (FGV) played pivotal roles in advancing digital methods in Brazil. The former is by offering courses and publications covering techniques for monitoring and researching social media. The latter is through the Department of Public Policy Analysis (DAPP Lab), which developed methodologies to meet academic needs and produced reports to serve the public through multidisciplinary research. In 2017, the Advanced Studies Center on Digital Democracy (CEADD) of UFBA became the central laboratory of the National Institute of Science and Technology for Digital Democracy (INCT.DD). This initiative has focused on understanding how media and networks shape political and social phenomena, such as the rise of the far-right, misinformation, and electoral campaigns. 

In 2019, MĂ©todos Digitais: Teoria-PrĂĄtica-CrĂ­tica (2019), edited by Janna Joceli Omena, marks the launch of the first book in Portuguese on digital methods, gathering seminal and original texts authored by key Brazilians and International researchers in the field. The book addresses digital methods from a theoretical, practical, and critical perspective and has been adopted by several Brazilian universities to introduce these methods. Since 2019, research groups and labs have been established in the country, including the principles and practice of digital methods. For instance, the R-EST research group of the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), under Carlos D’Andrea’s coordination, investigates how digital platforms mediate political and social interactions.

Programme

Opening 14:00 – 14:15

Welcome & What digital methods are we talking about?

Janna Joceli Omena (in person)

This opening statement unpacks digital methods from conceptual and practical perspectives. It will focus on how the practice of digital methods enables researchers to conduct digital fieldwork and gain a deeper understanding of their study topic through the lens of three distinct yet interconnected pillars: (i) platform grammatisation, (ii) online (sub)cultures of use, and (iii) the affordances and limitations of computational media necessary for implementing the method.

đŸ“ŁđŸ•žïžđŸ™‹đŸ»Please join this Miroboard (https://bit.ly/Metodos-Digitais-Brasil-Miroboard) to introduce yourself and ask questions throughout the talks.

đŸ“ŁđŸ‡§đŸ‡· đŸ‘©đŸ»â€đŸ’» You are welcome to contribute and be part of the Digital Methods Global South Network by filling out the form Mapeando MĂ©todos Digitais no Brasil.

15m Interventions 

14:15 – 14:30

Mapping research groups and labs developing digital methods across five Brazilian Regions: North, Northeast, Central-West, Southeast, South

Alan Angeluci (in person)

This presentation shares the findings of a bibliometric study that identifies Brazilian researchers and institutions from all five regions of the country who have published scientific works employing or focused on digital methods.

14:30  – 14:45

Digital Methods and Schools of (Digital) Media and Communication Studies: Convergencies and Possibilities in Brazil

Elias Bitencourt (online)

This talk briefly revisits key research schools and agendas within the field of media and communication studies in Brazil that have created favourable conditions for the emergence of initiatives focused on the research and development of digital methods in the country.

14:45 – 15:00

A brief history of software development for digital methods research in Brazil

Giulia Tucci (online)

This talk explores tools and methodologies developed in Brazil that are (or could be) used in digital methods research, highlighting innovative practices and localized contributions. Examining key projects and software initiatives showcases Brazil’s role in advancing digital research techniques and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration.

Tea break

15:00 – 15:15

Discussant Commentary and Q&A Panellists

15:15 – 15:30

Critical commentary and insights 

Richard Rogers (in person)

15:30 – 15:40

Q&A Panelists 

📣You can join this Miroboard to ask questions đŸ™‹đŸżâ€â™€ïžđŸ™‹đŸ»đŸ™‹đŸœâ€â™‚ïž

Short link: https://bit.ly/Metodos-Digitais-Brasil-Miroboard 

Collective Discussion

15:40 – 16:15

Dialogue, Connection & Collective Discussion

Thais Lobo, Janna Joceli Omena (in person)

This moment fosters dialogue about the current state of digital methods for Internet research in Brazil. We will use a shared document to promote dialogue, networking, and the launch of a Global South network.

📣You can join this Miroboard to engage in collective discussion and networking ✹

Short link: https://bit.ly/Metodos-Digitais-Brasil-Miroboard 

Meet the Guest Speakers

Alan Angeluci

Alan is a Productivity Research Fellow (PQ-2) of the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq). Senior Lecturer at the Department of Information and Culture, School of Communications and Arts, University of SĂŁo Paulo (ECA/USP), and at the Graduate Programs in Information Science and Communication Sciences (PPGCI and PPGCOM ECA/USP). Leader of the Smart Media and Users Research Group (SMU/CNPq) (smartmediausers.org). Conducted postdoctoral studies at ECA/USP and the University of Texas at Austin, USA. Holds a PhD from the Polytechnic School of USP, with a doctoral exchange period at the University of Brighton, England. Earned a Master’s and Bachelor’s degree from the Faculty of Architecture, Arts, Communication, and Design at SĂŁo Paulo State University (UNESP). Main areas of teaching, research, and outreach include Data Visualisation, Digital Methods, Information and Communication Technologies (ICT), Digital Culture, and Human-Computer Interaction (HCI).

Elias Bitencourt

Elias is an Associate Professor in the Design Undergraduate Program at the State University of Bahia (UNEB), with a Ph.D. in Communication from FACOM/UFBA and a Master’s in Culture and Society from IHAC/UFBA. Visiting researcher at the Milieux Institute in Canada in 2019. Lead of Datalab/Design (CNPq) at UNEB, a research and development lab dedicated to data visualization and digital methodologies. Research interests include data visualization, digital methods, platform studies, digital imaginaries, and the social impacts of algorithmic mediation. Background in Design, Applied Social Sciences, Information Science, Digital Humanities, STS, Digital Methods.

Giulia Tucci

Giulia Tucci has a Ph.D. in Information Sciences (2023) from the Brazilian Institute of Information in Science and Technology (IBICT) and the School of Communication at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ). She has a master’s degree in Biomedical Engineering from COPPE/UFRJ (2011) and a bachelor’s degree in Chemical Engineering from PUC-Rio (2006). Since 2017, she has focused her studies on the information flow on digital platforms. Her doctoral research investigated the flow of information (and disinformation) on Telegram during the 2022 electoral campaign in Brazil. Her expertise spans computational social sciences, political studies, and digital methods. Currently, she is a postdoctoral researcher in a joint program between IBICT and UFRJ, as well as a visiting researcher at the Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, contributing to the CGIAR FOCUS Climate Security program.

Richard Rogers

Richard Rogers is Professor of New Media and Digital Culture, Media Studies and Director of the Digital Methods Initiative, Humanities Labs, University of Amsterdam. He is author of Information Politics on the Web, Digital Methods (both MIT Press) as well as Doing Digital Methods (Sage). 

Meet the Moderators

Janna Joceli Omena

Janna is from Northeast Brazil, Pernambuco, Recife, and has a PhD in Digital Media from NOVA University Lisbon. She is the author of MĂ©todos Digitais: Teoria-PrĂĄtica-CrĂ­tica (2019), the first edited collection on digital methods in Portuguese, bringing together seminal and original texts. In Lisbon, Portugal, she founded the SMART Data Sprint (2016-2023), an initiative that provided a platform for teaching and developing digital methods, benefiting hundreds of participants and collaborators. She is a Digital Methods Lecturer (Assistant Professor) at King’s College London. Janna’s work focuses on understanding the epistemological dimensions of AI, web technologies, digital objects, and research software in designing and implementing methods and their role in research and knowledge production. Her research explores the practice and theory of digital methods, where she investigates the technicity of computational media from conceptual, technical, and empirical perspectives. She applies this knowledge to develop accessible and reproducible methodologies, supporting collaborations that build research software for analysing visual media content and online data.

Thais Lobo

Thais Lobo holds an MA in Digital Humanities from King’s College London and is currently engaged in ERC-funded research projects within the Departments of Digital Humanities and War Studies (Digisilk and Security Flows, respectively). As a media researcher and practitioner, she combines data analysis and research outreach to disseminate critical insights into digital platforms and online cultures. She has applied digital methods to explore social issues like health disinformation, political bots, greenwashing, climate change denial, datafication and digital surveillance in interdisciplinary projects collaborating with external organisations in the UK. Her experience includes roles in the media and research fields in Brazil.

Contact

Janna Joceli Omena, J.J.Omena@kcl.ac.uk

Thais Lobo, thais.matias@kcl.ac.uk

Acknowledgements

Janna Joceli Omena led the ideation of the event and authored this page, with contributions from Thais Lobo, Elias Bitencourt, Giulia Tucci and Alan Angelluci to the overall discussion and editorial work, bringing their experience on the Brazilian academic landscape. Bitencourt has also contributed to the section A Quick-and-Dirty Historical Context of Digital Methods in Brazil. Many thanks to Charlotte and Iryna for providing event logistics support, and special thanks to Jonathan Gray and Liliana Bounegru for their support in making this event possible.

Job: Digital Methods Research Associate at Media of Cooperation, University of Siegen

The Media of Cooperation Research Centre at the University of Siegen is hiring a Digital Methods Research Associate. Further details can be found here and copied below.

[- – – – – – – ✄ – – – snip – – – – – – – – – -]

Job title: Research Associate – Digital Methods / Scientific Programmer (SFB 1187)

Area: Faculty I – Faculty of Philosophy | Scope of position: full-time | Duration of employment: limited | Advertisement ID: 6274

We are an interdisciplinary and cosmopolitan university with currently around 15,000 students and a range of subjects from the humanities, social sciences and economics to natural sciences, engineering and life sciences. With over 2,000 employees, we are one of the largest employers in the region and offer a unique environment for teaching, research and further education.

In Faculty I – Faculty of Philosophy, SFB 1187 Media of Cooperation, we are looking for a research assistant in the field of Digital Methods/Scientific Programming as soon as possible under the following conditions:

100% = 39.83 hours

Salary group 13 TV-L

limited until December 31, 2027

YOUR TASKS

  • Support in the development and teaching of digital research methods within the framework of the SFB Media of Cooperation and teaching in the media studies courses.
  • Development, implementation and updating of software tools for working with digital research methods, as well as further development of existing open source research software, such as 4CAT.
  • Support in the collection, analysis and visualization of data from online media within the framework of the research projects of the SFB Media of Cooperation, especially in the area of ​​social media platforms, audiovisual platforms, generative AI, apps and sensory media.
  • Administration and maintenance of the digital research infrastructure for data collection, archiving and analysis
  • Participation in the planning and implementation of media science research projects
  • Technical support for workshops and events
  • Networking with developers of research software, also internationally
  • Teaching obligation: 4 semester hours per week

YOUR PROFILE

  • Completed academic university degree (diploma, master’s, magister, teaching qualification, comparable foreign degree) in computer science, business informatics, media studies or a related discipline
  • Experience with system administration and support of server environments (Linux) as well as the operation of web-based applications (e.g. 4CAT)
  • Very good knowledge of developing applications with Python and database systems (MySQL or similar) or willingness to deepen this
  • Basic knowledge of web development with JavaScript, PHP, HTML, CSS, XML or willingness to acquire this
  • Affinity for working with data from platforms, apps, web or other data-intensive media, for example using scraping or API Retrieval
  • Ability to work in a team, creativity and very good communication skills
  • Fluent written and spoken English
  • Experience in the conception and development of research software and interest in supporting the research of the SFB Media of Cooperation

OUR OFFER

  • Promotion of your own scientific or artistic qualification in accordance with the Scientific Temporary Employment Act
  • Various opportunities to take on responsibility and make a visible contribution in the field of research and teaching
  • A modern understanding of leadership and collaboration
  • Good compatibility of work and private life, for example through flexible working hours and place of work as well as support with childcare
  • Comprehensive personnel development program
  • Health management with a wide range of prevention and advice services

We look forward to receiving your application by December 24, 2024.

Please only apply via our job portal (https://jobs.uni-siegen.de.) Unfortunately, we cannot consider applications in paper form or by email.

German language skills are nice to have, but not required.

Contact: Prof. Dr. Carolin Gerlitz

New chapter on “#amazonfires and the online composition of ecological politics” in Digital Ecologies book

How are digital objects – such as hashtags, links, likes and images – involved in ecological politics?

Public Data Lab researchers Liliana Bounegru, Gabriele Colombo and Jonathan Gray explore this in a new chapter on “#amazonfires and the online composition of ecological politics” as part of a book on digital ecologies: mediating more-than-human worlds which has just been published on Manchester University Press.

Here’s the abstract for the chapter:

How are digital objects such as hashtags, links, likes and images involved in the production of forest politics? This chapter explores this through collaborative research on the dynamics of online engagement with the 2019 Amazon forest fires. Through a series of empirical vignettes with visual materials and data from social media, we examine how digital platforms, objects and devices perform and organise relations between forests and a wide variety of societal actors, issues, cultures – from bots to boycotts, agriculture to eco-activism, scientists to pop stars, indigenous communities to geopolitical interventions. Looking beyond concerns with the representational (in-)fidelities of forest media, we consider the role of collaborative methodological experiments with co-hashtag networks, cross-platform analysis, composite images and image-text variations in tracing, eliciting and unfolding the digital mediation of ecological politics. Thinking along with research on the social lives of methods, we consider the role of digital data, methods and infrastructures in the composition and recomposition of problems, relations and ontologies of forests in society.

Here’s the book blurb:

Digital ecologies draws together leading social science and humanities scholars to examine how digital media are reshaping the futures of conservation, environmentalism, and ecological politics. The book offers an overview of the emerging field of interdisciplinary digital ecologies research by mapping key debates and issues in the field, with original empirical chapters exploring how livestreams, sensors, mobile technologies, social media platforms, and software are reconfiguring life in profound ways. The collection traverses contexts ranging from animal exercise apps, to surveillance systems on the high seas, and is organised around the themes of encounters, governance, and assemblages. Digital ecologies also includes an agenda-setting intervention by the book’s editors, and three closing chapter-length provocations by leading scholars in digital geographies, the environmental humanities, and media theory that set out trajectories for future research.

Chatbots and LLMs for Internet Research? Digital Methods Winter School and Data Sprint 2025

The annual Digital Methods Winter School in Amsterdam will take place on 6-10th January 2025 with the theme “Chatbots and LLMs for Internet Research?”. The deadline for applications is 9 December 2024. You can read more on this page (an excerpt from which is copied below).

Chatbots and LLMs for Internet Research? Digital Methods Winter School and Data Sprint 2025
https://wiki.digitalmethods.net/Dmi/WinterSchool2025

The Digital Methods Initiative (DMI), Amsterdam, is holding its annual Winter School on ‘Chatbots for Internet Research?’. The format is that of a (social media and web) data sprint, with tutorials as well as hands-on work for telling stories with data. There is also a programme of keynote speakers. It is intended for advanced Master’s students, PhD candidates and motivated scholars who would like to work on (and complete) a digital methods project in an intensive workshop setting. For a preview of what the event is like, you can view short video clips from previous editions of the School.Chatbots and LLMs for Internet Research? Towards a Reflexive ApproachPositions now are increasingly staked out in the debate concerning the application of chatbots and LLMs to social and cultural research. On the one hand there is the question of ‘automating’ methods and shifting some additional part of the epistemological burden to machines. On the other there is the rejoinder that chatbots may well be adequate research buddies, assisting with (among other things) burdensome and repetitive tasks such as coding and annotating data sets. They seem to be continually improving, or at least growing in size and apparent promise. Researcher experiences are now widely reported: chatbots have outperformed human coders, ‘understanding’ rather nuanced stance-taking language and correctly labeling it better than average coders. But other work has found that the LLM labeling also has the tendency to be bland, given how the filters and safety guardrails (particularly in US-based chatbots) tend to depoliticise or otherwise soften their responses. As researcher experience with LLMs becomes more widely reported, there are user guides and best practices designed to make LLM findings more robust. Models should be carefully chosen, persona’s should be well developed, prompting should be conversational and so forth. LLM critique is also developing apace, with (comparative) audits interrogating underlying discrimination and bias that are only papered over by filters. At this year’s Digital Methods Winter School we will explore these research practices with chatbots and LLMs for internet research, with an emphasis on bringing them together. How to deploy and critique chatbots and LLMs at the same time, in a form of reflexive usage?

There are rolling admissions and applications are now being accepted. To apply please send a letter of motivation, your CV, a headshot photo and a 100-word bio to winterschool [at] digitalmethods.net. Notifications of acceptance are sent within 2 weeks after application. Final deadline for applications is 9 December 2024. The full program and schedule of the Winter School are available by 19 December 2024.

The @digitalmethods.net Winter School in Amsterdam will take place on 6-10th January 2025 with the theme “Chatbots and LLMs for Internet Research?”. Apply by 9th December. 📝✹ publicdatalab.org/2024/11/29/d… #digitalmethods

[image or embed]

— Public Data Lab (@publicdatalab.bsky.social) 5 December 2024 at 10:56
Post by @publicdatalab@vis.social
View on Mastodon

troubling AI: a call for screenshots 📾

How can screenshots trouble our understanding of AI?

To explore this we’re launching a call for screenshots as part of a research collaboration co-organised by the Digital Futures Institute’s Centre for Digital Culture and Centre for Attention Studies at King’s College London, the mĂ©dialab at Sciences Po, Paris and the Public Data Lab.

We’d be grateful for your help in sharing this call:

Further details can be found here and copied below.

[- – – – – – – ✄ – – – snip – – – – – – – – – -]

troubling AI: a call for screenshots 📾

How can screenshots trouble our understanding of AI?

This “call for screenshots” invites you to explore this question by sharing a screenshot that you have created, or that someone has shared with you, of an interaction with AI that you find troubling, with a short statement on your interpretation of the image and circumstances of how you got it.

The screenshot is perhaps one of today’s most familiar and accessible modes of data capture. With regard to Al, screenshots can capture moments when situational, temporary and emergent aspects of interactions are foregrounded over behavioural patterning. They also have a ‘social life’: we share them with each other with various social and political intentions and commitments.

Screenshots have accordingly become a prominent method for documenting and sharing AI’s injustices and other AI troubles – from researchers studying racist search results to customers capturing swearing chatbots, from artists exploring algorithmic culture to social media users publicising bias.

With this call, we are aiming to build a collective picture of AI’s weirdness, strangeness and uncanniness, and how screenshotting can open up possibilities for collectivising troubles and concerns about AI.

This call invites screenshots of interactions with AI inspired by these examples and inquiries, accompanied by a few words about what is troubling for you about those interactions. You are invited to interpret this call in your own way: we want to know what you perceive to be a ‘troubling’ screenshot and why.

Please send us mobile phone screenshots, laptop or desktop screen captures, or other forms of grabbing content from a screen, including videos or other types of screen recordings, through the form below (which can also be found here) by 15th November 2024 10th December 2024.

Your images will be featured in an online publication and workshop (with your permission and appropriate credit), co-organised by the Digital Futures Institute’s Centre for Digital Culture and Centre for Attention Studies at King’s College London, the mĂ©dialab at Sciences Po, Paris and the Public Data Lab.

Joanna Zylinska
Tommy Shaffer Shane
Axel Meunier
Jonathan W. Y. Gray

Hybrid event for special issue on critical technical practice(s) in digital research, 10th July 2024

There will be a launch event for the Convergence special issue on critical technical practice(s) in digital research on Wednesday 10th July, 2-4pm (CEST). This will include an introduction to the special issue, brief presentations from several special issue contributors, followed by discussion about possibilities and next steps. You can register here.

Critical Technical Practice(s) in Digital Research- special issue in Convergence

A special issue on “Critical Technical Practice(s) in Digital Research” co-edited by Public Data Lab members Daniela van Geenen, Karin van Es and Jonathan W. Y. Gray has been published in Convergence: https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/cona/30/1.

The special issue explores the pluralisation of “critical technical practice”, starting from its early formulations by Philip Agre in the context of AI research and development to the many ways in which it has resonated and been taken up by different publications, projects, groups, and communities of practice, and what it has come to mean. This special issue serves as an invitation to reconsider what it means to use this notion drawing on a wider body of work, including beyond Agre.

A special issue introduction explores critical technical practices according to (1) Agre, (2) indexed research, and (3) contributors to the special issue, before concluding with questions and considerations for those interested in working with this notion.

The issue features contributions on machine learning, digital methods, art-based interventions, one-click network trouble, web page snapshotting, social media tool-making, sensory media, supercuts, climate futures and more. Contributors include Tatjana Seitz & Sam Hind; Michael Dieter; Jean-Marie John-Mathews, Robin De Mourat, Donato Ricci & Maxime CrĂ©pel; Anders Koed Madsen; Winnie Soon & Pablo Velasco; Mathieu Jacomy & Anders Munk; Jessica Ogden, Edward Summers & Shawn Walker; Urszula Pawlicka-Deger; Simon Hirsbrunner, Michael Tebbe & Claudia MĂŒller-Birn; Bernhard Rieder, Erik Borra & Stijn Peters; Carolin Gerlitz, Fernando van der Vlist & Jason Chao; Daniel Chavez Heras; and Sabine Niederer & Natalia Sanchez Querubin. 

There will be a hybrid event to launch the special issue on 10 July, 2-4 pm CEST.

Links to the articles and our evolving library can be found here:
https://publicdatalab.org/projects/pluralising-critical-technical-practices/.

If you’re interested in critical technical practices and you’d like to follow work in this area, we’ve set up a new mailing list here for sharing projects, publications, events and other activities: https://jiscmail.ac.uk/CRITICAL-TECHNICAL-PRACTICES

Image credit: “All Gone Tarot Deck” co-created by Carlo De Gaetano, Natalia SĂĄnchez QuerubĂ­n, Sabine Niederer and the Visual Methodologies Collective from Climate futures: Machine learning from cli-fi, one of the special issue articles.

New article on cross-platform bot studies published in special issue about visual methods

An article on “Quali-quanti visual methods and political bots: A cross-platform study of pro- & anti- bolsobots” has just been published in the special issue “Methods in Visual Politics and Protest” of the Journal of Digital Social Research, co-authored by Public Data Lab associates Janna Joceli Omena, Thais Lobo, Giulia Tucci, Elias Bitencourt, Emillie de Keulenaar, Francisco W. Kerche, Jason Chao, Marius Liedtke, Mengying Li, Maria Luiza Paschoal, and Ilya Lavrov.

The article provides methodological contributions for interpreting bot-associated image collections and textual content across Instagram, TikTok and Twitter/X, building on a series of data sprints conducted as part of the Public Data Lab “Profiling Bolsobot Networks” project.

The full text is available open access here. Further details and links can be found at the project page. Below is the abstract:

Computational social science research on automated social media accounts, colloquially dubbed “bots”, has tended to rely on binary verification methods to detect bot operations on social media. Typically focused on textual data from Twitter (now rebranded as “X”), these methods are prone to finding false positives and failing to understand the subtler ways in which bots operate over time and in particular contexts. This research paper brings methodological contributions to such studies, focusing on what it calls “bolsobots” in Brazilian social media. Named after former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, the bolsobots refer to the extensive and skilful usage of partial or fully automated accounts by marketing teams, hackers, activists or campaign supporters. These accounts leverage organic online political culture to sway public opinion for or against policies, opposition figures, or Bolsonaro himself. Drawing on empirical case studies, this paper implements quali-quanti visual methods to operationalise specific techniques for interpreting bot-associated image collections and textual content across Instagram, TikTok and Twitter/X. To unveil the modus operandi of bolsobots, we map the networks of users they follow (“following networks”), explore the visual-textual content they post, and observe the strategies they deploy to adapt to platform content moderation. Such analyses tackle methodological challenges inherent in bot studies by employing three key strategies: 1) designing context-sensitive queries and curating datasets with platforms’ interfaces and search engines to mitigate the limitations of bot scoring detectors, 2) engaging qualitatively with data visualisations to understand the vernaculars of bots, and 3) adopting a non-binary analysis framework that contextualises bots within their socio-technical environments. By acknowledging the intricate interplay between bots, user and platform cultures, this paper contributes to method innovation on bot studies and emerging quali-quanti visual methods literature.

zeehaven – a tiny tool to convert data for social media research

Zeeschuimer (“sea foamer”) is a web browser extension from the Digital Methods Initiative in Amsterdam that enables you to collect data while you are browsing social media sites for research and analysis.

It currently works for platforms such as TikTok, Instagram, Twitter and LinkedIn and provides an ndjson file which can be imported into the open source 4CAT: Capture and Analysis Toolkit for analysis.

To make data gathered with Zeeschuimer more accessible for for researchers, reporters, students, and others to work with, we’ve created zeehaven (“sea port”) – a tiny web-based tool to convert ndjson into csv format, which is easier to explore with spreadsheets as well as common data analysis and visualisation software.

Drag and drop a ndjson file into the “sea port” and the tool will prompt you to save a csv file. ✹📩✹

zeehaven was created as a collaboration between the Centre for Interdisciplinary Methodologies, University of Warwick and Department of Digital Humanities, King’s College London – and grew out of a series of Public Data Lab workshops to exchange digital methods teaching resources earlier this year.

You can find the tool here and the code here. All data is converted locally.